Serving Larchmont Village, Hancock Park, and the Greater Wilshire neighborhoods of Los Angeles since 2011.

United Neighbors Presents Housing Element to GWNC Land Use Committee

La Brea Hancock HOA President Cathy Roberts and Hancock Park HOA President Cindy Chvatal-Keane representing United Neighbors, a coalition of neighborhoods, told the GWNC Land Use Committee the City’s Housing Element massively upzones the city to the detriment of single-family neighborhoods.

Tasked with complying with the state’s demand that the City of Los Angeles create more than 450,000 new housing units by 2029, the City Planning Department’s 2021-2029 Housing Element has proposed effectively rezoning most of the city’s neighborhoods creating a capacity for over 1 million new housing units, Hancock Park HOA President Cindy Chvatal-Keane and La Brea-Hancock HOA President Cathy Roberts told members of the GWNC Land Use Committee at their meeting last week.

Chvatal-Keane and Roberts, representing United Neighbors, a coalition of neighborhoods across the working to protect multi-family and single-family neighborhoods while supporting affordable housing, urged the committee to educate our local neighborhoods before it’s too late.

Chvatal-Keane and Roberts told the committee the current version of the Department of City Planning’s Housing Element calls for zoning to allow over 1 million units by creating increased density on multi-family lots and expanding the city’s Transit Oriented Community (TOC) program allowing in 4 to 6 story buildings in single-family neighborhoods. The plan also calls for the creation of Opportunity Residential Corridors (OPP RC) on streets currently under-used for housing, like Melrose Avenue or Beverly Blvd, which have “important lifestyle amenities” such as services, transit access, and jobs also allowing 4 to 6-story apartment buildings in single-family neighborhoods.

Considering declining population growth and existing zoning that accommodates 230,000 units, the city’s goal should be closer to 255,000 units, which includes a 7% cushion the department had planned, explained Chvatal-Keane.

“But these zoning plans would double the amount of housing throughout the city,” she said. “And, the recently approved Downtown and Hollywood community plans have 259,500 units, so the city has already met the RHNA numbers!”

Cathy Roberts, President of La Brea Hancock said the city should be looking to add housing on Melrose and La Brea avenues but not on the residential streets showing maps of how the new zoning would affect local neighborhoods.

“Sycamore Square is being upzoned, instead the density should be on La Brea,” said Roberts. “Brookside with the unique urban Brookside stream running along Longwood Avenue is one of the streets Planning is proposing to upzone. This steam, which connects to Ballona Creek, is protected by the state and therefore creates a sensitive land use for our area as it is a unique environmental resource that needs to be protected.”

“This should be done with community-based planning,” said Chvatal-Keane. “We should be part of the discussion that puts the density on our commercial corridors, and stops developer giveaways but City Planning is not engaging communities. It was nearly impossible to find these maps on the city’s website and there is no City Council file where we can submit comments and engage in the discussion.”

Roberts said there are more appropriate locations throughout the city for upzoning, such as areas that already permit multi-family uses. Instead of breaking zoning in established neighborhoods, the City should focus on implementing adaptive reuse of existing commercial buildings for housing, as implemented in other major cities, such as Montreal, said Roberts.

Chvatal-Keane and Roberts urged the committee to go on the record opposing the current Housing Element. They asked the committee to send the following motion to the GWNC Board for consideration at the next meeting.

Motion: Whereas, the Housing Element and Community plan updates have sufficient zoning opportunities in commercial corridors, on public lands, and through adaptive reuse to meet state mandates. There is no need to further rezone through overlays and other zoning devices R1 zones or sensitive, rent-stabilized multi-family housing dividing and destroying communities and neighborhoods. The Greater Wilshire Neighborhood Council LUC recommends the GWNC opposes the Housing Elment’s proposed rezoning and densification of R1 and multi-family neighborhoods beyond what SB9 and ADU laws currently allow.

The motion was unanimously approved. Click here to view Chvatal-Keane and Robert’s presentation. Click here to read our previous reporting on the Housing Element.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Patricia Lombard
Patricia Lombard
Patricia Lombard is the co-editor and publisher of the Larchmont Buzz. Patty lives with her family in Fremont Place. She has been active in neighborhood issues since moving here in 1989. Her pictorial history, "Larchmont" for Arcadia Press is available at Chevalier's Books.

Related Articles


  1. As a member of the United Neighbors working group, I applaud the decision of the GWNC LUC! I hope that more of our neighbors will read this article, ask questions and understand we do not need to destroy our single family neighborhoods to meet our housing goals.

  2. Be aware that when the commercial corridors are targeted for massive upzoning, if those streets are included in your neighborhood PPD, then the TOC and Density Bonus occupants will have the right to obtain permits to park on your residential streets. This means any TOC or DB project on La Brea, Wilshire or Olympic which are in PPD 114 and PPD2 respectively. Look at your PPD maps and you will see the problem. The solution is to move quickly to ask CD5 to sponsor a boundary reduction of these GWNC preferential parking districts. On the other side of La Brea, Friends of Historic Miracle Mile recently made such a request to remove La Brea and portions of 3rd Street and Wilshire from PPD 78. The councilwoman’s response was, “Reducing PPD boundaries is not our office’s priority at this time.” The City is misusing a 2016 Attorney General Opinion as an excuse but we’ve obtained documentation from the Attorney General that the opinion does not apply to TOC, so it looks as if the City simply wants to protect luxury developers ability to rent units in future projects by having a free de facto parking lot for luxury mixed use TOC and DB commercial corridor projects in the form of our neighborhood streets. In other words, talk the talk–let’s discourage car use by underproviding offstreet parking in buildings to be occupied by rich, car owning people, and then let’s encourage car use by giving them a free de facto parking lot in the form of the neighborhood PPD. We are working very hard to get this dysfunctional loophole closed and would appreciate other groups getting involved.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

.printfriendly { padding: 0 0 60px 50px; }